Who funds international organizations?
Countries pool money to deliver food, protect refugees, respond to disease and work together on security. Each organization has its own budget and reporting rules.
Three ways money is counted
Member dues
A required share of an organization’s budget. A bill due is not proof it has been paid.
Voluntary contributions
Extra support a donor chooses to provide. Some donations must be used for a named country or project.
Loans and capital
Development banks also lend money and receive investments. A loan, a guarantee and a grant are different things.
Where does the money go?
These are selected examples, not a complete list of U.S. payments to every organization. The table uses each organization’s reported contributions. It does not claim that all figures are cash paid in the same year.
On a small screen, scroll sideways to see every column.
| Organization and purpose | Period | U.S. contribution | Other donors: examples | Source and measure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| World Food Programme (WFP)Food and nutrition assistance during emergencies and hunger crises. | 2024 | $4,447.5 | United Kingdom: $609.9 European Commission: $591.8 | WFP donor contributions |
| UNICEFChildren’s health, nutrition, water, education and protection. | 2024 | $1,118 | Germany: $679 United Kingdom: $413 | Contributions receivedGovernment donors only; private UNICEF committees are separate. |
| UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR)Protection and assistance for refugees and other displaced people. | 2024 | $2,052 | United Kingdom: $111.8 European Commission: $270.6 | U.S. profile · UK · EU |
| World Health Organization (WHO)Disease prevention, health guidance and emergency coordination. | 2022–2023 Two years | $1,284 | Germany: $826.4 | U.S. contributions · GermanyHistorical donor profiles. See the U.S. withdrawal update below. |
WHO: what changed after those contributions?
On January 22, 2026, the U.S. government announced that it had completed its withdrawal from WHO. Its later fact sheet says U.S. membership, participation in governance and funding contributions ended.
The WHO row above describes 2022–2023, before that change. It should not be read as an amount the U.S. continues to give each year. WHO’s January 24 response said the withdrawal raised issues for its governing bodies to consider.
Why use a shared organization?
Reach and experience
A shared group may have staff, supplies and local partners ready to respond.
Share the cost
Several donors can fund a large response together. Flexible funds can help overlooked crises.
Check performance
Donors still need to review results, overhead, audits and the risk of misuse. Shared funding does not remove those questions.
Twenty years of contributions to WFP
Every calendar year from 2005 through 2025. The same organization and donor measure are used throughout. Figures are millions of U.S. dollars at the time—not adjusted for inflation. For example, 1,000 means $1 billion.
This is a history of WFP contributions only. It is not total foreign aid or total United Nations funding. The European Commission is an EU institution, not a country.
On a small screen, scroll sideways to see every column.
| Year | United States | Germany | United Kingdom | Japan | Canada | European Commission |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 1,173.7 | 69.5 | 111.6 | 160.5 | 152.5 | 263.9 |
| 2006 | 1,123.3 | 59.7 | 100.4 | 71.4 | 149.4 | 265.8 |
| 2007 | 1,184.2 | 65.8 | 66.9 | 118.9 | 161.4 | 250.4 |
| 2008 | 2,070.4 | 100.8 | 169.0 | 178.2 | 275.4 | 355.4 |
| 2009 | 1,766.5 | 132.1 | 127.6 | 202.9 | 225.3 | 343.0 |
| 2010 | 1,552.7 | 95.8 | 157.1 | 214.8 | 285.5 | 289.9 |
| 2011 | 1,242.6 | 195.3 | 143.9 | 282.1 | 302.3 | 258.6 |
| 2012 | 1,460.1 | 150.2 | 202.1 | 190.7 | 367.1 | 386.1 |
| 2013 | 1,493.8 | 230.4 | 451.9 | 238.5 | 366.7 | 333.4 |
| 2014 | 2,226.7 | 301.3 | 408.8 | 156.8 | 350.1 | 372.5 |
| 2015 | 2,008.2 | 329.3 | 456.8 | 197.6 | 261.6 | 247.9 |
| 2016 | 2,014.3 | 884.7 | 356.0 | 208.8 | 211.0 | 891.8 |
| 2017 | 2,509.8 | 916.7 | 587.7 | 175.7 | 195.8 | 376.8 |
| 2018 | 2,534.4 | 849.1 | 615.4 | 130.1 | 218.3 | 1,111.3 |
| 2019 | 3,368.4 | 886.7 | 696.4 | 157.6 | 189.7 | 685.9 |
| 2020 | 3,645.3 | 1,179.9 | 549.0 | 193.7 | 244.0 | 537.4 |
| 2021 | 3,809.5 | 1,414.0 | 376.3 | 226.5 | 314.4 | 497.9 |
| 2022 | 7,249.6 | 1,783.7 | 417.2 | 265.5 | 442.8 | 698.2 |
| 2023 | 2,978.3 | 1,329.1 | 290.7 | 209.0 | 306.9 | 504.7 |
| 2024 | 4,447.5 | 990.9 | 609.9 | 155.5 | 166.8 | 591.8 |
| 2025 | 2,065.9 | 570.0 | 435.2 | 124.2 | 235.4 | 593.5 |
Read the change carefully
WFP recorded about $2.07 billion from the United States in 2025, compared with $4.45 billion in 2024. The U.S. share of WFP’s all-donor total in 2025 was about 31.7%.
A change can reflect budgets, crises, grant timing and reporting revisions. The table alone does not tell us which policy caused every rise or fall. It also does not show how many people each dollar helped.
How much development aid do other countries give?
This broader comparison includes aid delivered directly and through organizations. It is not a table of payments to international organizations alone. ODA means official development assistance: aid mainly meant to support development and well-being. Military aid is excluded. Some costs of hosting refugees inside a donor country can be included.
The OECD measures grants and the gift-like part of eligible loans. That is called a grant equivalent. It is not the same as cash sent abroad. GNI means a country’s total national income; the percentage helps compare countries of different sizes.
On a small screen, scroll sideways to see every column.
| Country | Aid, USD billions | Share of national income |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | $29.09 | 0.56% |
| United States | $28.95 | 0.09% |
| United Kingdom | $17.18 | 0.43% |
| Japan | $16.22 | 0.35% |
| France | $14.53 | 0.42% |
| Netherlands | $7.69 | 0.58% |
| Italy | $7.28 | 0.30% |
| Canada | $7.24 | 0.32% |
| Sweden | $5.96 | 0.85% |
| Norway | $5.67 | 1.03% |
| Spain | $5.14 | 0.27% |
| Switzerland | $4.57 | 0.46% |
| South Korea | $3.88 | 0.20% |
| Denmark | $3.43 | 0.72% |
| Australia | $3.29 | 0.18% |
What about NATO?
NATO is a defense alliance. Its shared budgets pay for joint headquarters, command systems and infrastructure. A member’s spending on its own military is a separate figure; it is not a payment into NATO’s bank account.
On a small screen, scroll sideways to see every column.
| Measure | Amount |
|---|---|
| Civil budget | €528.2 million |
| Military budget | €2.42 billion |
| Security Investment Programme ceiling | €2.2 billion |
| Overall common-funding limit in the resource plan | Up to €5.3 billion |
On a small screen, scroll sideways to see every column.
| Member | Share of common funding |
|---|---|
| United States | 14.9039% |
| Germany | 14.9039% |
| United Kingdom | 10.3277% |
| France | 10.1023% |
| Italy | 7.9925% |
| Canada | 6.5845% |
These percentages show the agreed split of shared costs, not cash payments received and not shares of all allied military spending. All 32 members contribute under the formula.
What is outside these tables?
The UN regular budget, peacekeeping, the World Bank and other development banks have separate accounts. A member’s assessed bill, an unpaid balance, a multi-year pledge and a loan should not be combined as if they were the same payment.
For more organizations, the UN system donor database reports revenue by government donor. Its accounting rules and changing organization coverage need to be checked before making a long-term comparison. The WFP history above keeps one organization consistent.